Eddingfield v. State ex rel. Cheney
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Wabash Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, J. —
Judgment was rendered against appellant in bastardy proceedings in the court below.
The following errors are assigned in this court:
1. That the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.
2. That the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion in arrest of judgment.
The second error has been waived by failure to discuss it and, therefore, we will not further consider it.
One of the reasons assigned in the motion for a new trial is that ‘ 'the court erred in giving to the jury as law, instructions numbered 3, 9, 10, 12, of the general instructions of the court, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Kelley v. KelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Allen v. BondIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- American Fire Insurance Co. of New York v. SiskIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- Franklin v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Saunders v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Globe Accident Insurance v. HelwigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Indianapolis & Martinsville Rapid Transit Co. v. EdwardsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.