Gaul v. Philadelphia
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Chidsey,
• . In these three actions of mandamus the City of Philadelphia and certain of its officers joined as defendants, ¿ppeai from the several judgments entered on the pleadings ordering reinstatement of the respective plaintiffs to positions in the City government from *496which they had been dismissed. The cases were argued together in the court below which rendered an opinion in one case (the Jennings case) which was made applicable to the others. The cases were similarly argued together in this Court and all of them will be considered and determined in this opinion.
In…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Travis v. TeterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Tanenbaum v. D'AscenzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of San Antonio v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Soltis AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Marchese v. MarcheseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Pennsylvania Ass'n of State Mental Hospital Physicians, Inc. v. State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Knecht v. Citizens & Northern BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.