Legal Opinion

Tanenbaum v. D'Ascenzo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1946No. Appeal, 185PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,

Two questions are raised by this appeal. (1) Is a licensed osteopathic physician a “physician legally qualified to practice medicine” within the meaning of section 1501 of the School Code of May 18, 1911, P. L. 309, 24 PS 1501 and (2) Is an alternative writ of mandamus, in the facts of this case, a proper proceeding in which to have the main question determined?

W. L. Tanenbaum, appellant, is a licensed osteopathic physician. He took a civil service examination held by the Civil Service Commission of the City of Philadelphia for the position of school…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Herskovits Et Ux. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Souder v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Truitt v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Travis v. TeterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Citizens Committee to Recall Rizzo v. Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Maxwell v. Farrell School District Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Nicolella v. Trinity Area School District School BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API