Legal Opinion

United States v. Marino Amador-Leal

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2002No. 01-10037PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYMER, Circuit Judge:

Marino Amador-Leal appeals his conviction and sentence pursuant to a guilty plea on one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The magistrate judge did not explain the potential immigration consequences of Amador-Leal’s conviction when the plea was taken. The question presented here is whether immigration consequences are collateral, as we held in Fruchtman v. Kenton, 531 F.2d 946 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895, 97 S.Ct. 256, 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976), or have become direct in light of the aggravated felony…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. JimenezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Douglas Fruchtman v. Frank Kenton, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Joseph Torrey v. Wayne EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. PobleteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. United States v. Ivania Maria Couto, Also Known as Sealed Dft 35Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. Zhang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. State v. ParedezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API