Legal Opinion
State v. Paredez
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 2004No. 28,270PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
{1} Defendant Ramon Paredez pleaded guilty to criminal sexual contact of a minor in the third degree, contrary to NMSA 1978, § 30-9-13(A)(2) (2001). After sentencing, Defendant filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the basis he was not adequately informed of the immigration consequences of his plea. The district court entered an order denying his motion, which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals in a memorandum opinion. State v. Paredez, No. 24,082 (N.M.CtApp. Aug. 20, 2003). We granted certiorari pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 34-5-14(B) (1972) and Rule 12-502 NMRA…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- People v. BaretNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Roberto Morales Diaz v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- In re the Personal Restraint of Yung-Cheng TsaiWashington Supreme Court · 2015
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.