United States ex rel. Salem-Bedford Stone Co. v. Sheridan
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky
At Law. On demurrer to petition.
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, District Judge.
The United States, for the purpose of making certain public improvements at lock No. 8, on the Kentucky river, entered into a contract with the defendant Thomas A. Sheridan, who agreed to construct the same. Previous to the beginning of the work Sheridan was required to execute, and did execute, a bond to' the United States conditioned according to the requirements of the act “for the protection of persons furnishing materials and labor for the construction of public works,” approved August 13, 1894 (28 Stat. 278 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2523] ), which bond was dated…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. WebsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. SaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States ex rel. Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. HenderlongU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1900
- Moore v. Town Council of EdgefieldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1887
- Whitworth v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Bogue v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1912
- Barnard-Curtiss Company and the Seaboard Surety Company, Surety v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of D. W. Falls Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- United States ex rel. Maxwell v. BarrettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1905
- United States v. ChurchyardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.