Whitworth v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky
On Motion to Remand Cause to State Court.
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a citizen of Tennessee, as he alleges in his petition, and as is also stated in the petition for a removal, brought this action in a state court of Kentucky against the defendant, a citizen of Illinois, to recover a sum in excess of f2,000. Upon the petition of the defendant it was removed to this court, and the plaintiff has asked that it be remanded to the state court for trial. The claim to this relief is based upon the provisions of section 1 of the act of August 13, 1888 (25.Stat. 433), by which, in substance, it is provided that the district and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Capron v. Van NoordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1804
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Louisville & N. R. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1914
- Iowa Lillooet Gold Min. Co. v. BlissU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1906
- Foulk v. GrayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia · 1902
- Sagara v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1911
- Rome Petroleum & Iron Co. v. Hughes Specialty Well Drilling Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.