Moore v. Town Council of Edgefield
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina
Rule to Show Cause why a mandamus should not issue to levy a tax for the payment of a judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtSimonton, J.
On the rule-day, in May, 1887, the plaintiff obtained judgment by default against the town of Edgefield in the sum of $2,105, and costs; the cause of action consisting of certain bonds and coupons issued by defendant. Judgment was entered for the principal of the bonds, and the coupons with interest on them, in detail as follows:
Principal of bonds past due, - $1,440 00
Coupons for 3J years, - .... 435 go
$1,876 80
Interest on such principal and on the coupons, - - - 228 95
$2,105 75
The execution issued upon this judgment having been returned nulla, bona, application was made for a rule to show…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Elliott v. Lessee of PeirsolSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Rosenbaum v. BauerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Dunn v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- James Conolly and Others v. Richard Taylor and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Kanouse v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Home Life Ins. Co. v. SippCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
- United States v. RobinsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Huntington v. CrouterOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- United States ex rel. Salem-Bedford Stone Co. v. SheridanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.