Dietzsch v. Huidekoper
Supreme Court of the United States
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woods
After the recovery of the judgment at law, on June 5, 1878, by Charles Kern, one of the appellants, in the Circuit Court for the County of Cook, in the action of replevin mentioned in Kern v. Huidekoper, supra, p. 485, notwithstanding the removal of the said cause to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, the writ of retorno habendo was issued thereon, which the plaintiffs in the replevin suit refused to obey. Thereupon, on June 7, 1878, an action of debt upon the replevin bond given by them was begun in the Circuit Court of Cook County against Frederick…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- French v. HaySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
3Cited by114 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Toucey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.