Legal Opinion
United States v. Inaba
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided July 21, 1923No. 1085PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The contention that this court is without jurisdiction to grant the injunctive relief asked is predicated upon section 265 of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. § 1242), which reads:
“The writ of injunction shall not be granted by any court of the United States to stay proceedings in any court of a state, except in cases where *417such injunction may be authorized by any law relating to proceedings in bankruptcy.”
No "case has been cited by counsel, and I have not been able to find any, 'in which section 265 has been considered in connéction with a case wherein the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Julian v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. McIntoshDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1932
- United States v. Leiter Minerals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1954
- United States v. City of SalamancaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.