Bakst v. Probst (In Re Amelung)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
DAVID R. DUNCAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in this Court’s Order, Plaintiff is awarded Judgment against Defendant. The Court sets aside the transfer by Debtor to Defendant and holds that Plaintiff should recover the transfer.
ORDER
The relief set forth on the following pages, for a total of 8 pages including this page, is hereby ORDERED.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Chapter 7 Trustee Michael R. Bakst’s (“Plaintiff’) Complaint against Robert J. Probst (“Defendant”) to recover a $10,000 payment made by Frank A. Amelung…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Future Group, II v. NationsbankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Campbell v. Deans (In Re J.R. Deans Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2000
- Gardner v. KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Mathis v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Hovis v. Ducate (In Re Ducate)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gordon v. Hackenberry (In re Alpha Protective Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2017
- Friedman v. GrantUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
- Gordon v. Rogich (In re Alpha Protective Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2017