Legal Opinion

Bakst v. Probst (In Re Amelung)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina

Decided September 17, 2010No. 15-06882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

DAVID R. DUNCAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in this Court’s Order, Plaintiff is awarded Judgment against Defendant. The Court sets aside the transfer by Debtor to Defendant and holds that Plaintiff should recover the transfer.

ORDER

The relief set forth on the following pages, for a total of 8 pages including this page, is hereby ORDERED.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Chapter 7 Trustee Michael R. Bakst’s (“Plaintiff’) Complaint against Robert J. Probst (“Defendant”) to recover a $10,000 payment made by Frank A. Amelung…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Future Group, II v. NationsbankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Campbell v. Deans (In Re J.R. Deans Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2000
  3. Gardner v. KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. Mathis v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Hovis v. Ducate (In Re Ducate)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Hackenberry (In re Alpha Protective Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2017
  2. Friedman v. GrantUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
  3. Gordon v. Rogich (In re Alpha Protective Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API