Legal Opinion
Mathis v. Burton
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided July 17, 1995No. 2375PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Connor, Judge:
Greenville Hospital System sought to have a conveyance of real property from Myrtle Mathis to her son, James Mathis, declared void. The hospital claimed the transfer was fraudulent under the provisions of S.C. Code Ann. § 27-23-10 (1991), more commonly known as the Statute of Elizabeth. The trial judge set aside the transfer. We affirm.
Myrtle Mathis received in-patient and out-patient cancer treatments at Greenville Hospital System from April 11,1990, until her death on August 11, 1991. She died in the hospital. The State Cancer Fund made the only payments to the hospital on Ms.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. PlylerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
- Lebovitz v. MuddSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Parker Peanut Company v. FelderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Dennis v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Gentry v. LanneauSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Campbell v. Deans (In Re J.R. Deans Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2000
- Hovis v. Ducate (In Re Ducate)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
- Campbell v. Cathcart (In Re Derivium Capital, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
- Campbell v. Cathcart (In Re Derivium Capital LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
- Campbell v. Hanckel (In re Hanckel)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.