Legal Opinion

Oxman v. Independent School District of Duluth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 8, 1929No. 27,529PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial. Plaintiff, a licensed and qualified school teacher, brought this action to recover for six weeks’ salary from September 5 to October 15, 1927, both dates inclusive.

L. 1927, p. 42, c. 36, was approved on March 14,1927, to take effect from and after July 1 of that year. Its title is:

“An act to regulate the employment of teachers in the public schools in cities of the first class and fixing the conditions under which they may hold their positions or may be discharged or may be demoted.”

Section 4 thereof provides that all…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. Common School District No. 3Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Perry v. Independent School District No. 696Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Frisk v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Hosford v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. State ex rel. Schmidtkunz v. WebbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API