Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Gifford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 3, 1953No. 35655PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Parties are referred to herein as in the trial court.

Plaintiffs Jackson and Ray are the owners of a place of business where auction sales are conducted, known as the Paw-huska Auction. They sued defendant Gif-ford to recover $825.74, the amount of a check given by defendant after purchasing some hogs at the auction sale; defendant stopped payment on the check before it cleared the bank.

Defendant’s answer alleged failure of consideration in that within a few days after the sale, all of the hogs except 4 had died. It further alleged that there was an express warranty as to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Myers v. ChamnessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Eden v. VloedmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Hassell v. HassellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Wat Henry Pontiac Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. The Texas Co. v. BelvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. GoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Lenn v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API