Legal Opinion

United States v. Louis Manos

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 20, 1988No. 87-1273PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Louis Manos was an inspector for the Chicago Consumer Services Department. He received bribe payments from restaurant owners subject to inspection by the Department, which led to his conviction for conducting the affairs of the Department through a pattern of racketeering, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), 1 and for ex torting monies from the restaurant owners under color of official right, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. 2 Manos seeks a reversal of the conviction, arguing that the district court abused its discretion by limiting Manos’s introduction of evidence,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Stewart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. Ronald Thomas BohleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Terry Ray UptainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. United States v. David Hughes, Also Known as Jesse Ellebee, Atilano Velasquez, and Martin LeanosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Chemetall Gmbh v. Zr Energy, Inc., Joseph T. Fraval, and Arnold BerkovitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Gary Van WyheCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Bernard A. FishCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API