Legal Opinion

United States v. Gary Van Wyhe

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 24, 1992No. 91-2591PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal revolves around the testimony of an indicted co-conspirator and convicted felon, the appellant’s bird collection and the government’s transgression in closing argument. But first a review of the facts.

In May 1990, Keith Larimer, a convicted felon who had agreed to cooperate with the government in its investigation of drug dealers, was instructed to contact Michael Donegan, a co-defendant of appellant Gary Van Wyhe, about purchasing a kilogram of cocaine. Larimer and Donegan had several conversations about the purchase from May through July 1990, some of which…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Greer v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. Mason Townsend, Luis E. Diaz, Orlando Nunez, Dorothy Taylor, Carlos Mejia, Joseph Angel Claudio, and Isabel MarquezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Mandell Jackson, Joseph Davis, and Romano GinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. United States v. Kevin O. Depriest and Steve MorrellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. GoinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Joseph B. Carson, John K. Lanter, Wilbert Hall, Aaron Hall, and Ronald L. FlaugherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. OrosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Jerome CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API