Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Whisnant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1945PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The sufficiency of the plaintiff’s pleadings to constitute a cause of action was challenged by the demurrer interposed by defendants upon two grounds: (1) that the cause of action attempted to be set up was one arising under the Patent Laws of the United States, and therefore cognizable only in the Federal Courts, and (2) that in any event plaintiff had failed to allege sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action. The ruling of the court below in entering judgment that the demurrer be sustained requires consideration of both grounds upon which the demurrer was based.

1. By Art. I, sec. 8,…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Walker v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Cameron v. New Hanover Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Spartan Equipment Co. v. Air Placement Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Tart v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API