Alford v. Textile Insurance Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
Plaintiff predicates her right to recover the sum of $5,000 instead of the $3,175 paid into court on the theory that she was a beneficiary of the insurance policy issued by defendant; that the Legislature had prescribed the form of liability policies which might be issued, and the forms so prescribed did not, as she puts it, “vest in the insurance carrier the arbitrary and ex parte right to make settlement for personal injury with one or more of the persons injured in one accident, to the prejudice of another injured in the same accident, and that such settlements as are made by a liability…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Southern Fire & Casualty Co. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
- Douglas v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924
- State Automobile Mut. Ins. Co. of Columbus v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Bennett v. ConradySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Peeler v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. SorianoTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Bohna v. HUGHES, THORSNESS, GANTZAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Vernon Gray v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.