Legal Opinion
In Re Sulzer Hip Prosthesis and Knee Prosthesis Liability Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 3, 2006No. 1:01-mj-09000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
455 F.Supp.2d 709 (2006)
In re: SULZER HIP PROSTHESIS AND KNEE PROSTHESIS LIABILITY LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: Howard
v.
Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc., 1:03CV9006 Burgess
v.
Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc., 1:04CV9005
No. 1:01-CV-9000.
United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.
October 3, 2006.
Andrew M. Greenwell, James R. Harris, Harris & Greenwell, Corpus Christi, TX, Charles R. Parker, Hill & Parker, Houston, TX, Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Reserve, LA, James R. Dugan, II, Stephen B. Murray, Jr., Murray Law Firm, New Orleans, LA, Don Barrett, Barrett Law Office, Lexington, MS, John L.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Gomez v. St. Jude Medical Daig Division Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Elizabeth and Clifford Kemp v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Medtronic, Inc. Sprint Fidelis Leads Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Jessen v. Mentor Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Warstler v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
- In Re Trade Partners, Inc., Investors LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
- Howard v. SULZER ORTHOPEDICS, INC.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.