Guttery v. Kilgore
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
Suit upon a promissory note. The trial was had before the court, without the intervention of a jury, and resulted in judgment for plaintiff for $1,175.30.
The complaint at first consisted of but a single count, and declared upon the note as if all defendants were comakers.
Before the trial was entered upon, the plaintiff amended her complaint by adding count A thereto. This count, so far as here necessary to be stated for a proper understanding of the case, is as follows:
“Count A. The plaintiff claims of the defendant $800.00 due by promissory note executed by W. L. Guttery on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Holczstein v. Bessemer Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Schillinger v. LearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Carter v. Long Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Hamill v. McCallaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Scarbrough v. City National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spragins v. McCalebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Copeland v. Swiss Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Crescent Credit Corp. v. UNION BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF MONTGOMERYCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Porter v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Copeland v. Swiss Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951