Legal Opinion

Guttery v. Kilgore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 7, 1937No. 6 Div. 51PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Suit upon a promissory note. The trial was had before the court, without the intervention of a jury, and resulted in judgment for plaintiff for $1,175.30.

The complaint at first consisted of but a single count, and declared upon the note as if all defendants were comakers.

Before the trial was entered upon, the plaintiff amended her complaint by adding count A thereto. This count, so far as here necessary to be stated for a proper understanding of the case, is as follows:

“Count A. The plaintiff claims of the defendant $800.00 due by promissory note executed by W. L. Guttery on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holczstein v. Bessemer Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Schillinger v. LearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Carter v. Long Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. Hamill v. McCallaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Scarbrough v. City National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spragins v. McCalebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Copeland v. Swiss Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Crescent Credit Corp. v. UNION BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF MONTGOMERYCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  4. Porter v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Copeland v. Swiss Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API