Spragins v. McCaleb
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is a suit in equity for contribution as it is there called by qne indorser against others jointly bound by irregular indorsement on a note given by a corporation, in which all the indorsers were interested. It has the anomalous condition of being payable to one of the indorsers who loaned the money to the máker which was a corporation, of which he was president, on a note signed by the corporation acting by him as president and indorsed by him individually and by eleven others interested in the corporation. The note is payable “on demand after date,” ahd “with interest at…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Rouse v. Wooten.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Truss v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Little v. People's BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Esslinger v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Washington v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Van Antwerp v. Van AntwerpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Howle South Creamery v. Alabama State Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Brown v. the First National Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Stebens v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Continental Oil Co. v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.