Legal Opinion

Holczstein v. Bessemer Trust & Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1931No. 6 Div. 778PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an action by the appellee against the appellants on a promissory note.

The complaint consists of á single count, and, omitting the paragraph alleging waiver of exemption and claiming attorney’s fee, is in the following words: “Plaintiff claims of the defendants $1,548.45 due by promissory note made by them on December 10, 1929, and payable the 11th day of February, 1930, with interest thereon from maturity at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum.”

To this complaint the defendants filed the general issue, and seventeen special pleas. The trial court sustained a demurrer to twelve of said…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Beck & Pauli Lithographing Co. v. HouppertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Herring, Farrell & Sherman v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  4. Little v. People's BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Barbour v. PoncelorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Blake v. CoatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Bradley v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Hamill v. McCallaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Steiner Bros. v. SlifkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API