Hamill v. McCalla
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is a bill in equity to foreclose a mortgage on real estate, and incidentally it seeks a deficiency judgment against both the mortgagor, who is the maker of the note, and also against the irregular indorser, who is appellant.
Appellant demurred on the ground that a deficiency judgment could not he rendered against him on his objection, because, in effect, his obligation is separate and distinct from that of the maker; in other words, that they are several and not joint debtors. His demurrer was overruled, and that ruling presents the only question for us to consider on this…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Little v. People's BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Winston v. BrowningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Holczstein v. Bessemer Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Tedder v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Schillinger v. LearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lee v. MacOn County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Rhodes v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- First Nat. Bank v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Wiggins Estate Co. v. JefferySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Edge v. BiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.