Legal Opinion
In Re 730 Chickens
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 9, 1991No. 472PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the Vinton County Court which granted an application for forfeiture of seven hundred thirty chickens seized by the state of Ohio, appellee, pursuant to a search warrant and ordered the humane destruction of the chickens.
Appellants, Phillip Fleming and the Ohio Gamefowl Breeders Association (“OGBA”), who were never made parties to the forfeiture proceedings, assign the following errors:
“ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR I:
“The order of forfeiture issued by the Vinton County Court is contrary to law because the mandates of revised code Section…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. 1981 Dodge Ram VanOhio Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Interactive Gaming Council v. Commonwealth ex rel. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014
- In Re RETAINING VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE, L.L.P., AS SPECIAL COUNSELOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- E. Cleveland IAFF 500 v. E. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. CastorOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- oapse/afscme Local 4 v. BerdineOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.