Legal Opinion
Nasr v. Rubio
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided May 31, 2001No. 09-00-033 CV, 09-00-034 CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
50 S.W.3d 23 (2001)
In re Moe NASR, and
Moe Nasr, Appellant,
v.
Pedro Rubio and Debra Rubio, Appellees.
Nos. 09-00-033 CV, 09-00-034 CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.
Submitted January 23, 2001.
Decided May 31, 2001.
John H. Bennett, Jr., Susan M. Fillion, Bennett, Dunn, Arnold, Ellwood & Neal, L.L.P., Houston, for appellant.
Daniel O. Goforth, Scott P. Callahan, Goforth, Lewis & Williams, L.L.P., Houston, for appellee.
Before WALKER, C.J., BURGESS and GAULTNEY, JJ.
OPINION
WALKER, Chief Justice.
In these consolidated proceedings, Moe Nasr complains of the trial court's denial of his Motion to Stay…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Prudential Securities Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- EZ Pawn Corp. v. ManciasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.