Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1982No. 8129SC1009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

The defendant’s sole argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion for the return of the $4,360 seized by Officer Wilkins on 7 May 1981. We must disagree.

In this case the money was seized from defendant pursuant to a valid search warrant. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15-ll.Ka) provides that a law enforcement officer shall safely keep property seized pursuant to lawful authority under the direction of the court for “as long as necessary to assure that the property will be produced at and may be used as evidence in any trial.” (Emphasis added.) On 28 July…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Privette v. PrivetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. ChildsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API