Legal Opinion

State v. Childs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1965No. 94PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Cueiam.

Pursuant to Rule 13, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, the Attorney General’s motion is allowed.

Not every order or judgment of the superior court is immediately appealable to the Supreme Court. The statute, G.S. 1-277, regulates the practice in respect to when an order or judgment is subject to immediate review. This statute as construed and applied by numerous decisions of this Court is well analyzed and explained in detail by Ervin, J., in Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E. 2d 377. It would serve no useful purpose to restate here the various propositions there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Ponder v. CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Cowart v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. State v. ScalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Privette v. PrivetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ChildsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. ShoffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. JosephCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API