Legal Opinion

State v. Black

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1970No. 7022SC73PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MalláRD, C.J.

On this record it can be questioned whether the defendant has properly moved for a jury trial in all three of the cases against him. The answer seems to depend upon the interpretation of the words “above entitled matter” as used in the motion.

The defendant is not an indigent and is now and has been represented by privately employed counsel.

The only exceptions in the record appear under the assignments of error. This is not sufficient to present for review the questions sought to be presented. 1 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 24; see also State v. Hewett, 270 N.C. 348,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Wolfe v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. State v. . NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. JosephCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API