Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 21, 2000No. 99-278 SSHPublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendant’s motion to dismiss, plaintiffs’ opposition thereto, defendant’s reply, and plaintiffs’ surreply. Upon consideration of the entire record, the Court denies defendant’s motion. Although findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under Rule 12 or 56, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); Summers v. Department of Justice, 140 F.3d 1077, 1079-80 (D.C.Cir.1998), the Court nonetheless sets forth its reasoning.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are former employees of McLouth Steel Products Corporation (“McLouth…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Arbitraje Casa De Cambio, S.A. De C v. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- McManus v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Jung v. Association of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Calvetti v. AntcliffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Badwal v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.