Southern Pac. Co. v. Hall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWLEY, District Judge.
This action was brought to recover damages for injuries received by the defendant in error, alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence and carelessness of the plaintiff in error, on February 3, 1896, at the city of Redding, Cal. It appears from the pleadings and evidence that at said time the plaintiff in error maintained and used in said city a water tank or hydrant, from which it took water to use in the management of its railroad, and which was situated about three feet distant from the track upon which it run its train of cars in the conveying of passengers…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- District of Columbia v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- City of Wynnewood v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Davidson S. S. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Bullitt v. Delaware Bus Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1935
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. BardsleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.