Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Bardsley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
The defendant in error, claiming to have been arrested and unlawfully assaulted by a deputy sheriff of an Idaho county, brought this action for damages against the surety upon the sheriff’s official bond. There was a verdict for $5,500 and from the judgment thereon the defendant brings error. Two assignments have been argued, one involving instructions given and refused upon a certain point, and the other admissions of evidence touching the amount of damages.
Inasmuch as admittedly the evidence was sufficient to take the ease to the jury, an extended statement thereof…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Amos Wade v. Jacob R. Leroy and Henry E. PierrepointSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Flanagan v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Conner v. Pioneer Fire-Proof Const. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1886
- Graham v. Coeur D'Alene & St. Joe Transportation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hanson v. Reiss Steamship CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960
- (PC) Coleman v. VirgaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Baron v. Galactic Co., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Libutan v. MGM Grand Hotels LLC.District Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Marvin Cardenas v. Butler, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.