Legal Opinion
R.A., Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 3, 1996No. C1-96-779PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
R.A., Inc., et al., (appellants) challenge the determinations of the district court that: (1) respondent Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (A-B) was entitled to summary judgment on appellants’ claims of tortious interference with existing and prospective contracts; and (2) appellants lacked standing to bring a claim under the Minnesota Beer Brewers and Wholesalers Act (Act).
FACTS
A-B is a brewer of beers that sells its products through a network of authorized wholesalers. Capitol City Distributing Co., Inc. (Capitol City) was an exclusive wholesaler of A-B products.
R.A., Inc. (RA)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Superior Edge, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Ann M. Labarre v. Credit Acceptance Corporation, a Michigan Corporation Bankers & Shippers Insurance Company, Sued as "Bankers and Shippers Insurance Company", a Foreign Corporation First Lenders Insurance Services, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Bebo v. DelanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Ann M. LaBarre v. Credit AcceptanceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Gieseke ex rel. Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. IDCA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.