Legal Opinion
Cameron v. Monroe County Probate Court
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1998No. 106060, Calendar No. 10PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The question presented in this case is whether the county is responsible for paying a judgment entered against the probate court when the plaintiffs alleged discrimination under the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq.; MSA 3.548(101) et seq., by the probate judge.
The facts of the underlying suit were well-summarized by the Court of Appeals:
Cindy Cameron was formerly employed as Judge Seitz’ judicial secretary. She resigned her position in 1990 when Judge Seitz became hostile toward her shortly after she announced her intention to marry plaintiff Lawrence Cameron. Judge Seitz was removed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Employees & Judge of the Second Judicial District Court v. Hillsdale CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Grand Traverse County v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- People ex rel. Schmittdiel v. Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Silverman v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Kell v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wayside Church v. Van Buren CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Pucci v. Nineteenth District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- 46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Barachkov v. 41B District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Pucci v. Nineteenth District CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.