Legal Opinion

Barachkov v. 41B District Court

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 20, 2009No. 06-2512UnpublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*865OPINION

DAVID L. BUNNING, District Judge.

Patricia Barachkov, Nancy Englar and Carol Diehl, employees of the 41B District Court in Clinton Township, Michigan, were fired from their jobs in July 2004. Following their terminations, Appellants filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Appellees had violated Appellants’ First and Fourteenth Amendment rights by ending their employment because of interview statements Appellants made as part of a management oversight review conducted by the Michigan State Court Administrative Office (SCAO). The district court granted defendants’ motion for…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pucci v. Nineteenth District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. Patricia Barachkov v. Linda DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. Condiff v. Hart County School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2011
  4. Ortiz v. HolmesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
  5. Patterson v. CITY OF EARLINGTONDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API