Legal Opinion

Pucci v. Nineteenth District Court

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 10, 2008No. 07-10631PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Julie Pucci, has filed a second amended complaint alleging that she was wrongfully terminated from her job as an administrator in Michigan’s Nineteenth District Court when defendant Mark W. Somers became that court’s chief judge. She has pleaded four causes of action, but the foundation of her complaint is her belief that she lost her job when defendant Somers manipulated a court reorganization with the intention of eliminating her because her domestic…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pucci v. Nineteenth District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. Barachkov v. 41B District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Pucci v. SomersDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  4. Pucci v. Michigan Supreme CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  5. Turppa v. County of MontmorencyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API