Legal Opinion

Grand Traverse County v. State

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1995No. Docket Nos. 98712, 98714PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

These consolidated cases present us with statutory and constitutional questions regarding the funding of Michigan trial courts. With respect to the statutory question, MCL 600.9947; MSA 27A.9947, we conclude that the Legislature did not intend to create a judicially enforceable private cause of action for money judgment against the state. In § 9947(2), the Legislature clearly provided the remedy that would obtain if funding was not forthcoming. Hence, regardless of any intention to appropriate, the legislative remedy precludes the instant suit. Moreover, for the reasons stated below, we hold…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Judges of the 74th Judicial District v. Bay CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Wayne Circuit Judges v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. In Re Forfeiture of $5,264Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Wayne Circuit Judges v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Joseph Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Pucci v. Nineteenth District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Lash v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Judicial Attorneys Ass'n v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Judicial Attorneys Ass'n v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API