Legal Opinion

Weber v. Arend

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1928No. 26,975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

On January 11, 1927, judgment was entered in an action- based upon a contract dated December 9, 1924, in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Ray Arend (a son of defendants John Arend and Mary A. Arend) for $5,252.43. Execution was returned unsatisfied on April 21, 1927.

March 1, 1922, Ray Arend and his father purchased under a contract for deed lot 160, Union Park, in St. Paul. Each paid one-half of the payment when purchased as well as a portion of the subsequent payments. They have also equally contributed to the construction of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Watson v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Schmitt v. DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Schendel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Irish v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Grengs v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Larson v. TwetenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. First National Bank v. Van De PutteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Commerce Bank of Lebanon v. Halladale A Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API