Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Van De Putte

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 30, 1932No. 29,041PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff! appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

On March 10, 1931, defendant gave to the Marshall State Bank his promissory note for $450 due August 1, 1931. On April 29, 1931, this bank closed and passed into the hands of the commissioner of banks. Defendant then had in the bank $197.88 subject to check. On that day the Marshall State Bank had on deposit in plaintiff bank $530.44.

Plaintiff, holding defendant’s $450 note as collateral to a note given by J. V. Williams, prosecutes this action to collect of defendant, who seeks credit…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Manley v. Harvey Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Coffman v. KummerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Corn v. SheppardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Watson v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Downing v. MaagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Williams v. JungbauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Case v. FevigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Schaffer v. Hampton Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API