Schmitt v. Dahl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Brown county by plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Peter H. Dahl, to set aside a conveyance of real estate made by the bankrupt to defendant Amelia Dahl, on the ground that the transfer was in fraud of creditors. The case was tried before Webber, J., who found in favor of defendant. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, plaintiff appealed.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Brown county by plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Peter H. Dahl, to set aside a conveyance of real estate made by the bankrupt to defendant Amelia Dahl, on the ground that the transfer was in fraud of creditors. The case was tried before Webber, J., who found in favor of defendant. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, plaintiff appealed. Halil’s judgment against Peter H. Dahl is, in this action, conclusive against him and the whole world, as to the amount and the validity of the debt on which it was recovered, and it cannot be…
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
In 1895 Peter H. Dahl, a resident of Brown county, Minnesota, purchased certain real estate in Texas, made a cash payment thereon, and executed and delivered his certain promissory notes, maturing from one to four years, for the remainder of the purchase price. In 1900 an action was commenced in Brown county, Minnesota, • against him, to recover the amount due upon these notes, by C. W. Hahl, who was then the owner of the same. Dahl appeared and answered, admitted the execution of the notes, alleged that they were given in payment of certain Texas real estate, and that subsequent thereto the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Candee v. . LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Strong v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Sidensparker v. SidensparkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864
- County of Olmsted v. BarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Scott v. Indianapolis Wagon WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stolte v. KarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- National Surety Corporation of New York v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Teal v. Scandinavian-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Schendel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Irish v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.