Legal Opinion
Braun v. Ann Arbor Charter Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 20, 2004No. Docket No. 247109PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonofrio, J.
Plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant in this zoning case. Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred when it dismissed the action because it was not ripe for adjudication. Because we are not satisfied that plaintiffs have established that a final decision was made regarding the permitted uses of the property, we find that plaintiffs’ four claims are not ripe for adjudication. We affirm.
*156I. SUBSTANTIVE PACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs petitioned defendant to rezone approximately 363 acres of land from its current designation…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Paragon Properties Co. v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Citizens for Common Sense in Government v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Braun v. Ann Arbor Charter TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Frenchtown Charter Township v. City of MonroeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Braun v. ANN ARBOR CHARTER TP.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Braun v. Ann Arbor CharterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Dennis O'Connor v. State of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.