Legal Opinion

Braun v. Ann Arbor Charter Township

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 13, 2008No. 07-1370PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

I

In this Takings Clause and Due Process case, landowners who sought to rezone their farmland for a trailer park and other residential development challenge the district court’s order granting the defendant Township’s motion for summary judgment. The district court held that the plaintiffs’ Takings Clause claim was not ripe for review in the federal courts due to the rule of Williamson County v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 105 S.Ct. 3108, 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985), which requires that a plaintiff first give the state court an opportunity to adjudicate the issue of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Paterek v. Village of Armada, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Steven GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. EJS Properties, LLC v. City of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Puckett v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. Bench Billboard Co. v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API