Parrish & Co. v. Pulley
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of City of Charlottesville, in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants assign error.
1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.
This is an action to recover damages for a personal injury, After all the evidence had been introduced the defendants demurred to the evidence, but the trial court overruled the demurrer and entered judgment for the plaintiff for the damages' assessed by the jury, to which judgment this writ of error was awarded.
E. H. Parrish & Company (who will be hereinafter referred to as the defendants) were engaged in the construction of a brick building in the town of Covington. D. Landes was employed as foreman and put in charge of the erection of the building. L. O. Pulley (hereinafter called the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crispin v. . BabbittNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Bertha Zinc Co. v. Martin's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Norfolk & Western R. v. AmpeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- Johnson's Adm'r v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Norton Coal Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goshen Furnace Corp. v. Tolley's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Farmer's Administratrix v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Murden v. Virginia Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Davis v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1925