Legal Opinion

State v. Ortego

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1945No. 29374PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

The legal question here involved is whether, in a criminal case, the testimony given at a former trial by a witness, or witnesses, who cannot be produced at a subsequent trial, may, over the objection of the accused defendant, be proved by parol at the later trial. The facts giving rise to this question are as follows:

Upon a trial before the Honorable Guy B. Knott, justice of the peace in and for Seattle precinct, in King county, Washington, the defendant, Anthony Ortego, was found guilty of the crime of assault in the third degree and was sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars and costs.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. West v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. People v. HawthorneMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. People v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. KreckWashington Supreme Court · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API