Cordoza v. Pacific States Steel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal comes to us from the midst of lengthy post-judgment proceedings in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act case. For nearly two decades, the district court has overseen efforts by a series of special masters to transform an insolvent company’s contaminated steel plant site into a means of funding the former steelworkers’ medical plan. After other parties accused the special master of serious misconduct, the district court launched an investigation, held a hearing, and finally relieved the special master of his duties, requiring him to disgorge a portion…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Electronic Arts, Inc. v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Sigmund Lefkovitz v. Nathan Wagner, and Jarnis United Properties Co., Proposed Intervenor-Appellant, and Grippo & Elden, and 29-31 AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Castaneda v. Burger King Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Buckingham v. GannonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- (PC) Coleman v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.