Castaneda v. Burger King Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING CLASS CERTIFICATION AS TO TEN BURGER KING STORES AND OTHERWISE DENYING CLASS CERTIFICATION
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The normal class in an ADA action proceeds against a single store on behalf of all disabled patrons using that store. The in*560stant action seeks to proceed against approximately 92 different stores throughout California on behalf of a class of all mobility-impaired patrons at all 92 locations. All of the stores are Burger King restaurants. Although the class claims would share Burger King Corporation as a common target, the physical differences among…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Barrita, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Gray v. Golden Gate National Recreational AreaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Civil Rights Education & Enforcement Center v. Hospitality Properties TrustDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Vallabharpurapu v. Burger King Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Wagner v. White Castle System, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.