Legal Opinion

Buckingham v. Gannon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 22, 2009No. 08-35059, 08-35060PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We consider whether we have jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from an order disapproving a class settlement.

Facts

Plaintiffs were employees of the Montana Power Company and participated in its retirement plan. Defendants were the plan’s trustee and directors of Montana Power. Plaintiffs allege that defendants mismanaged the plan, in breach of their fiduciary duty. Plaintiffs and the directors negotiated a class settlement, the core of which was a cash payment of nearly all the funds remaining in the directors’ fiduciary liability insurance policy. The settlement also included two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Cordoza v. Pacific States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Touch America Holdings Inc. Erisa LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API