Legal Opinion

In Re Lord

California Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1926No. Docket No. Crim. 2922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The petitioner was found guilty by a verdict of a jury in the justice’s court of Modesto Township, in the county of Stanislaus, upon a complaint charging that he was on or about the thirtieth day of December, 1925, a “licensed and practicing physician and authorized to prescribe certain narcotic drugs, including morphine, and did then and there wilfully, wrongfully, and unlawfully prescribe and deliver to Mrs. Nellie Nash under said prescription, more than four grains of morphine, to-wit: approximately five grains of morphine, for one daily treatment of said Mrs. Nellie Nash, said Mrs. Nellie…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GreenallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Ex Parte HornefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. H. Jevne Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Matter of Application of LieritzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re JinglesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People v. BillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API