Legal Opinion

Wright v. Carlson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 29, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

These are four actions of tort, two of which are brought to recover damages for the death and conscious suffering of the plaintiff’s intestate, his daughter, a girl of *585eight years, against the administratrix of one Carlson, the owner of a taxicab, and its operator, the defendant Rose, who was Carlson’s agent, the other two actions being against the same defendants to recover consequential damages incurred by the father. The injuries to the girl, as a result of which it could have been found that she died after suffering consciously, were sustained in the early afternoon of December 31, 1938,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Keeney v. CiborowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Conrad v. MazmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Herman v. SladofskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Rasmussen v. WhippleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Lynch v. KrancerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Douglas v. WhittakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Enget Ex Rel. Enget v. NeffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Mitchell v. SilversteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Reynolds v. JacobucciMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Vieira v. East Taunton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API