Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 15, 1999No. 98CIV.0070(RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (“ABI”) has moved, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Joseph Anderson, Jr., pro se (“Anderson”), which alleges a discriminatory discharge on the basis of race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-1, et seq. (“Title VII”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted, and the complaint dismissed with prejudice.
Title VII has been a breeding ground for challenging issues, particularly where, as…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Saenger v. Montefiore Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- DARROE v. Staples, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Pesok v. HEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Taylor v. Procter & Gamble Dover WipesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- Jordan v. Olsten Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000