Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Procter & Gamble Dover Wipes
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 6, 2002No. Civ.A.00-593-JJFPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (D.I.27) and a Motion To Strike, Or In The Alternative, For Summary Judgment On Plaintiffs Claim Of Retaliation (D.I.45) filed by Defendant, The Procter & Gamble Dover Wipes Company. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant both of Defendant’s Motions.
BACKGROUND
I. Factual Background
Defendant, The Procter & Gamble Dover Wipes Company (hereinafter “P & G”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Procter & Gamble Company. (D.I. 29 at A-17). P & G purchased the Dover Wipes Company from…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weightman v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Smith v. Walgreen Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Carroll v. Acme Truck Line, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Heneghan v. Northampton Community CollegeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- BONDARUK v. PNC BANKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.